Showing posts with label Ed Miliband. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ed Miliband. Show all posts

15 July, 2015

Thanks in No Small Part to the Cowardice of Labour's Leadership*...

The biggest crackdown on trade union rights for 30 years will be unveiled on Wednesday, including new plans to criminalise picketing, permit employers to hire strike-breaking agency staff and choke off the flow of union funds to the Labour party.
The scale of the reforms goes far wider than the previously trailed plan for strikes to be made unlawful unless 50% of those being asked to strike vote in the ballot.
In a set of proposals on a par with those introduced by Norman Tebbit in 1985, Sajid Javid, the business secretary, is also to require that at least 40% of those asked to vote support the strike in most key public services. In the case of 100 teachers asked to strike, the action would only be lawful if at least 50 teachers voted and 40 of them backed the strike.
The double threshold would have to be met in any strike called in health, education, fire, transport, border security and energy sectors – including the Border Force and nuclear decommissioning.
In further changes, Javid will:
 Require all unions, not just those affiliated to Labour, to ask each existing union member whether they wish to pay the political levy and then repeat the question every five years. The £25m annual political fund income from 4.5 million political levy payers funds a wide range of political campaigning including being a chief source of funding for Labour.
 Propose that unlawful or intimidatory picketing should become a criminal as opposed to civil offence and new protections should be available for those workers unwilling to strike. A named official will be required to be available at all times to the police to oversee the picket including the numbers on the line, currently set at six, in an existing code of conduct.
 Compel unions to renew any strike mandate with a fresh ballot within four months of the first ballot and give employers the right to hire strike-breaking agency staff as well as require a union to give the employer at least a fortnight’s notice before the industrial action starts.
 Empower the government to set a limit on the proportion of working time any public sector worker can spend on trade union duties.
 Give the government certification officer powers to fine trade unions as much as £20,000 for breaches of reporting rules including an annual audit on its protests and pickets. The certification officer will also have power to initiate investigations and will in future be funded by a joint levy of unions and employers
 Require a clear description of the trade dispute and the planned industrial action on the ballot paper, so that all union members are clear what they are voting for.
The number of working days lost due to strikes was 704,000 in the 12 months to April 2015, but this is a far cry from the near 13m days lost through strike action on average in the 70s, the heyday of union militancy.
The government says it feels forced to act due to the number of strikes called on the London underground, railways or in schools based on small turnouts or two-year-old ballot mandates.
The leader of the train drivers’ union Aslef, Mick Whelan, has already likened the attack on union rights as resonant of fascist Germany.
Guess yer gonna need to distance yerselves even further from the unions.  Perhaps there's a few votes to be had in championing tax-relief for the children of foreign billionaire elitists.


* And to Ed's nose.  Sorry, but I just had to say it at some point.  Nativist perceptions about what a British leader should look like and sound like had a hell of a part to play in the man's perception, even to the degree of actual racism.

13 May, 2015

Oh, and one more thing...

David Miliband can go fuck himself and has as much right to dictate policy of British political parties as a syphilitic Chinese panda.  Ed may arguably have been trying these last five years to redeem himself of his time serving under that fascist traitor Tony Blair.  What's your excuse asshole ?

08 May, 2015

Embers


Surely that's only eight...oh, the pie...,okay.  Well, I'm glad about...the...and...if...the.....no, your list just sucks.  And for the record, 'though Ed's fate was probably inevitable, and Nick can go fuck himself, I do feel slightly sorry for Nige'.  Almost looked on that stage like he might cry...

Well...yet another right-wing win then.  That's how many in a row now (yes, I am counting Tone' & co. obvs.) ?

But hey, congrats. to Nicola & the SNP and to the Scots generally.  May they long hold the Sassenachs' feet to the fire in Westminster.  And the Welsh, well, maybe it's time they took some lessons from their Scottish cousins.  Wales at least controls its own capital, unlike the Saudi-Arabian/Emirate/Russian enclaves that make up what used to be central London.  England died already, don'tcha know ?  Maybe it's time we gave it a decent burial ?

Stopping now before I start sounding too much like a 'kipper and before even getting started on Northern Ireland.  Happy next five years !

03 May, 2015

Godda Speak Down to the 'Ard-Workin' Briddish People

So, 'parently affer Ed Miliband met wiv that Russell Brand bloke, Dave Cameron wuz all like e's a goon, inn'e ?  Makin' 'iself out like 'e's some Cockney geezer ?  It's embarassin' that when these posh politicians try-a talk down to the workin' classes like they weren't all Eton-educa'ed like:

Look at me, I ain't posh ad all.  I represent the ord'n'ry 'ard-workin' Briddish people.  I like 'avin beers down at the pub with the or'd'nry folks like youse.  I listen to Bastille.

It's embarassin', innit ?

02 May, 2015

Scary Ed

The Guardian's latest photo of Ed Miliband is one of the scariest things I've seen in a good long while.


But, I'm not sure they quite did it justice with their treatment.


So hey, here ya go...


There.  I've won you the election.  I'll take payment in Dollars or Euros.  But no Pund Scots please... 

28 April, 2015

That Mysterious 'Milibrand' Meeting

That super-secret meeting between Ed Miliband, and Russell Brand that the UK media have been hyperventilating over ?  Turns out, it was...an interview.  Ed Miliband gave an interview to a celebrity known for his outspoken political views, who happens to have over a million subscribers on YouTube.  Shock horror !  And thanks to all the breathless media coverage, the number of people watching is probably about to go up even more.  Thanks, news-media...



Update: Well, that was a whole bunch of nothing.  Here's a summary to save you sixteen minutes of your life:

Brand: Asks questions, tries to get Ed to say anything concrete.
Ed: Blah, blah, blah, blah.  Change is hard.  Blah, blah, blah.

But yeah.  He showed up.  So there's that.


Update: So turns out Brand did endorse Labour after all, which helps precisely no-one.  Sigh.

This'll Sway the Election for Sure


And we needed to know this now...why ?  FFS, first the SNP fearmongering from the Tories, then Ed cynically manipulating the deaths of migrants for political gain, and now suddenly days before the election, after all these years of letting himself be characterised as an atheist, Nick feels the need to set the record straight.

Nick, those who might actually care mostly can't tell the difference between atheist and agnostic, and wouldn't vote for you anyway.  Those who don't care and those who could tell the difference, well they wouldn't vote for you either.

Well, I guess if that Lab/Con. 'grand coalition' thing were to come off, Ed Miliband, while hardly the 'first Jewish Prime Minister', and looking rather less likely to be PM at all as the days wind down, could at least, Clegg having removed himself from contention, be the first Atheist Deputy Prime Minister.

27 April, 2015

Hang the DJ, Hang the DJ, Hang the DJ


Be Afraid !



Very Afraid !



They're coming to take your jobswelfare ! (Cough)Bullshit(Cough)



Bomb.  Bomb.  Bomb !  Your City !  BOMB !



'Vengeance !' Your 'worst nightmare' !  Behold, the terrifying wee Scots warrior-queen practising her deadly martial arts in preparation to wiping out the Sassenach scourge !




Well, it was always really only a matter of time, wasn't it ?

26 April, 2015

...And the Telegraph Entertains

7 leaders answer 7 questions


6. Setting aside your differences, which one of your political rivals has impressed you most and why?
Natalie Bennett: It took some guts for Ed Miliband to stand up to Murdoch - most leaders wouldn’t have done that...
So looking for a seat (singular probably) in a Labour coalition are we Nat. ?
..., and David Cameron stood up to many in his own party on gay marriage.
Hedging yer bets much ?
Leanne Wood: Nicola Sturgeon. She is tenacious and determined and an advocate for her country.
Uh...
Nicola Sturgeon: Leanne Wood, the leader of Plaid Cymru – she was fantastic in the debates, quite rightly putting Nigel Farage in his place.
...huh.


7. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
David Cameron: I wish I’d worked harder at speaking another language.
Sure, Dave.
Ed Miliband: I would always like to spend more time with my wife, Justine, and our children Daniel and Sam.
Uh, then why the hell are you campaigning to be PM ?
Nigel Farage: I'm too tolerant, sometimes. When it comes to loyalty, I often offer too much, even to people who have let me down repeatedly. Maybe I need to be more cutthroat.
And there's the headline...
Nick Clegg: I’d be Prime Minister.
No comment.

18 April, 2015

Good Ship Miliband on the Grauniad


Just ponder for a moment this image of Ed Miliband on the front page of the Guardian:


Feeling seasick yet ?  Worried you might be about to slide out of your chair ?


What might the Guardian be trying to tell us ?  Think this wasn't a considered editorial decision ?  This ain't the Telegraph.  They don't just pick photos at random.  Maybe there weren't any other pictures to choose from ?  This particular photographer only got the one photo from this particular event ?  Sound likely to you ?

Thankfully, Getty Images is publicly searchable, and...


So, yeah.  But, it's not just the tilt.  That extreme cropping has a lot to do with it as well, especially the way the Labour logo gets cut off at the bottom.  Of course, the Getty version of the photo was already a tight crop, and the ratios of the Guardian image and Getty's are different, not that that problem couldn't have been avoided by simply choosing one of the other photos on offer.

In fact, let's do...just...that.


And...


Well, minus the watermark, obviously...

17 April, 2015

Just...Really ?


Wasn't intending to post anything else re: the debates, but just WTF is this from the Independent ?  I thought maybe someone would be harping on about the lack of handshakes for Farage (which did seem petty to me), but this ?  On the front page ?

So, the three female leaders on stage hugged apparently, not that I noticed.  If you want to read something into that as in say the three female leaders celebrating the historicity of the event, then sure, great.  It is cool to see more women coming to the fore in British politics.  But what, somehow Ed was crushed by not being invited to join the hug ?  And this is somehow symbolic of a crushing defeat for Ed in a debate in which the consensus seems to be that he at least met if not exceeded expectations ?  While the other contender to actually be prime minister didn't show up ?

Hey Matt Dathan, would you have hugged Ed on that stage ?  Didn't think so.  Think Nicola et al. would have hugged you in Ed's place ?  Didn't think so.  Is this significant of anything what-so-the-fuck-ever ?  Didn't think so.

Were you desperate to come up with some unique angle on the debate so you could get paid by the Independent and couldn't manage any better than this ?  Ah...thought so.

16 April, 2015

Debate !


Is it just me, or is there not something really weird about seeing Ed on stage, debating the leaders of the nationalist parties (& Greens), while Nick & Dave are nowhere in sight ?  Not sure if the optics are good or bad for Labour, just strange and oddly unbalanced.


Update: And the Telegraph phones in their pre-scripted responses to the debate.


Uh, no.

21 March, 2015

That Cameron & Miliband Debate

Was going to go looking for a picture of Ed Miliband, from the bacon sandwich incident perhaps, but no look, here's the Guardian's headline for this story.  Yes, that Guardian.


The man on the right, you may recognise as David Cameron, the leader of the Conservative party, and the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.  The man on the left is the leader of the (for-now) main opposition party, Labour.  In defence of the Guardian editors who chose this picture, it's actually pretty typical of how he looks, and if anything he arguably sounds worse.  Why one might ask if you were the man on the right, would you be afraid to debate the man on the left...on television no less.  Not a rhetorical question; I genuinely don't get it.  Is Ed really that scary, that daunting a debater ?  These are both very intelligent man, but one was born to be a media personality, and one was not.  And if we're honest, sadly, personality and presence probably count a lot more in television debates for the average voter than the actual issues being debated.

For fun, let's go ahead (below the fold) and see what Google returns for images of these two men.