Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts

16 September, 2015

The Nightly Show on Fox News' Phoney War on Cops


Shit, Balko made it on to the Nightly Show.  Mentioned this nonsense earlier here.  Meanwhile, notice that Fox has apparently modified this particular story...

04 September, 2015

No Surrender: Donald Trump Wants the Republicans to Go Fuck Themselves...Slowly

Never got to this earlier, and could save it for the inevitable link-dump, but I do quite love this picture of Donald Trump having signed one of the bullshit pledges to the RNC (was the extra copy in case he didn't like the way his signature looked on the first try ?).  The make-me-look-smarter reading-glasses à la Rick Perry...the appropriate distance down his nose...The green tint that may or may not be an accident of white-balance...The unreadable savage blur of a signature coinciding with the almost Comic Sans. of his 'print' writing...The insane, 'I'm-not-balding' dead-animal-on-my-head comb-forward...And then...that look...


This is not the look of capitulation, Rand.  (Here, I'll sign ya shitty little piece o' paper...if, it'll make y'feel better...)  This is the look of a privileged and pampered sixty-nine-year-old teahadist maniac getting to live out a childhood fantasy at the expense of probably the entire world as his aging brain melts.  And we, in the media, the blogosphere, and social media, celebrate this lunacy at the possible expense of the survival of our own species

<Checks name of this blog>  Oh yeah...we're all fucked anyway !  Go for it Donnie ! Wha'the'hell ?!!

31 August, 2015

Donald Trump's Brilliant Willie Horton Ad.


See, this is why we need Donald Trump to Make America Great Again! Because only he can save us from the overwhelming number of illegal immigrants (not all of them, but most...probably, because that's all Mexico sends), murdering people left right and center. Your gardener, the woman at Taco Bell, the assistant at the dry cleaners, your taxi driver, all of them part of the massive crime wave sweeping America!

And Jeb! wants us to have compassion, nay love, for the ravenous murdering scum! Vote Donald Trump 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



* Bonus fun fact regarding that first graph above: Fox News launched in 1996.

24 August, 2015

Paging the Taliban


Well, we can't fold this up and stick it in a museum.  Time to break out the dynamite I guess...

23 August, 2015

Campaign Zero and BLM

This


could be the start of something interesting.  But I can't help noticing two things:
  1. That most media-outlets are uncritically associating this with #blacklivesmatter, without differentiating between this and the official Black Lives Matter group.
  2. That certain phrases such as 'institutional racism'*, and 'white supremacy' seem to be absent.

The page http://www.joincampaignzero.org/problem/, outlining the apparent problem, doesn't in fact use the word 'race' in any form at all.  It talks about police-violence, the fact that most victims were unarmed, and the fact that other countries don't kill civilians the way the US does, without mentioning race even once.  The racial disparity in the deaths is so blatant in the US, that I'd almost suspect the absence of that word as deliberate.
More than one thousand people are killed by police every year in America
Nearly sixty percent of victims did not have a gun or were involved in activities that should not require police intervention such as harmless "quality of life" behaviors or mental health crises.
This year is no different. There have only been nine days this year when the police have not killed somebody. Last month alone, the police killed 125 people. This must stop. We must end police violence so we can live and feel safe in this country.
We can live in an America where the police do not kill people. Police in England, Germany, Australia, Japan, and even cities like Newark, NJ, and Richmond, CA, demonstrate that public safety can be ensured without killing civilians. By implementing the right policy changes, we can end police killings and other forms of police violence in the United States.

At any rate, the framing does seem quite distinct from that of official BLM**:
#BlackLivesMatter was created in 2012 after Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman, was acquitted for his crime, and dead 17-year old Trayvon was post-humously placed on trial for his own murder. Rooted in the experiences of Black people in this country who actively resist our de-humanization, #BlackLivesMatter is a call to action and a response to the virulent anti-Black racism that permeates our society.Black Lives Matter is a unique contribution that goes beyond extrajudicial killings of Black people by police and vigilantes. 
It goes beyond the narrow nationalism that can be prevalent within Black communities, which merely call on Black people to love Black, live Black and buy Black, keeping straight cis Black men in the front of the movement while our sisters, queer and trans and disabled folk take up roles in the background or not at all.  Black Lives Matter affirms the lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, black-undocumented folks, folks with records, women and all Black lives along the gender spectrum.  It centers those that have been marginalized within Black liberation movements.  It is a tactic to (re)build the Black liberation movement.
When we say Black Lives Matter, we are broadening the conversation around state violence to include all of the ways in which Black people are intentionally left powerless at the hands of the state.  We are talking about the ways in which Black lives are deprived of our basic human rights and dignity.  How Black poverty and genocide is state violence.  How 2.8 million Black people are locked in cages in this country is state violence.  How Black women bearing the burden of a relentless assault on our children and our families is state violence.  How Black queer and trans folks bear a unique burden from a hetero-patriarchal society that disposes of us like garbage and simultaneously fetishizes us and profits off of us, and that is state violence.  How 500,000 Black people in the US are undocumented immigrants and relegated to the shadows. How Black girls are used as negotiating chips during times of conflict and war.  How Black folks living with disabilities and different abilities bear the burden of state sponsored Darwinian experiments that attempt to squeeze us into boxes of normality defined by white supremacy, and that is state violence.
#BlackLivesMatter is working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically and intentionally targeted for demise.  We affirm our contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression.  We have put our sweat equity and love for Black people into creating a political project–taking the hashtag off of social media and into the streets. The call for Black lives to matter is a rallying cry for ALL Black lives striving for liberation.

It's almost as if*** we're talking about (at least) two completely different groups, one focused upon practical solutions to police-violence, in the context of race, and the other, looking for some sort of outright revolution (against a patriarchal cis-normative hetero-white supremacy natch).  Not that there's anything inherently wrong with that.

I've yet to see what the more official BLM reaction to this effort is**** (interesting timing to release something over a weekend, isn't it ?), but I'm genuinely curious how this will play out, and to what degree the two groups will find common cause or cause for competition.


* Did see 'systemic racism'  a few times, and also 'racial' & 'racism' several times.

** Emphasis mine

*** Almost as if all black people don't think the same.  I know, who knew, right ?

**** If any -- The attention of the mainstream white media doesn't necessarily mean anything after all.

***** And I didn't even mention MLK or Malcolm X once...Yay me !  /snark.

11 August, 2015

TWiB Prime: Interview with Activist Marissa Jenae Johnson


Most people will already have their opinion on what happened with the protesters in Seattle, and listening to this probably won't change their opinion (doesn't mine), but I still find it fascinating to hear one of the young women who took the mic. from Sanders express her point of view directly.

So, here's self-described agitator Marissa Jenae Johnson in her exclusive interview with Elon & Co. at TWiB talking about what happened and her strategy of 'unrespectability' in fighting the modern 'white supremacist system' in the US.

09 August, 2015

Shutting It Down


One day Americans may be able to finally have the long overdue conversation about a culture of police-violence in the US...and how that relates to issues of racism.  But it's not going to happen in this electoral cycle.  Sadly.

19 July, 2015

And Isn't Hillary Glad Now She Stayed Away ?

#BlackLivesMatter co-founder warns presidential candidates: ‘We will shut down every single debate’
Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors criticized both Sen. Bernie Sanders and ex-Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley after Saturday’s protest at the Netroots Nation progressive conference.
“He couldn’t take 15 more minutes of the heat,” Cullors said of Sanders in an interview on This Week in Blackness, making reference to the senator ending his appearance as demonstrators at the event walked out en masse.
Journalist and activist Jose Antonio Vargas, who interviewed both Democratic candidates during the forum, later told The Raw Story that he was directed to wrap up his discussion with Sanders 15 minutes ahead of schedule.
Cullors told This Week host L. Joy Williams that she felt neither O’Malley nor Sanders were “humble enough” during their town hall appearance, and called on presidential candidates to be willing to openly discuss issues of race and gender.
“No more skirting around the issues,” Cullor said. “We will shut down every single debate.”

Well, that's good to know, I guess.  The Democratic primaries should be fun.

All I have to say on that particular shit-show that took place at Netroots Nation (you'll find plenty of videos on YouTube if you want to watch it) is this:

We have two overlapping issues here, police-violence and racism, both of which are complicated, one of which would be extremely difficult for any president to address, even given eight years (as Obama could probably attest), and the other of which, endemic as it is across all human society, will never be fully eradicated, and can only be worn down over time by education and engagement.  There are no simple solutions to these issues, and certainly nothing concise enough for a hashtag on Twitter.

If you want any kind of meaningful answer from politicians on these issues, it's going to have to involve a long ongoing conversation, and a lot of patience.  Or, sure, you could just shout them off stage.  It might make you feel better.  What it sure as hell won't do is prevent the further loss of black lives at the hands of trigger-happy, militarised, and oft-as-not racist cops.

05 July, 2015

Speaking of Risky Business...

This piece seems to be making the rounds regarding the situation in Greece.  Especially this:
With respect to Greece, the precise thing that European elites did to set the current chain of events in motion was to replace private debt with public during the 2010 first “bailout of Greece”. Prior to that event, it was obvious that blame was multipolar. Here are the banks, in France, in Germany, that foolishly lent. Not just to Greece, but to Goldman’s synthetic CDOs and every other piece of idiot paper they could carry with low risk-weights. In 2010, the EU, ECB, and IMF laundered a bailout of mostly French and German banks through the Greek fisc. Cash flowed into Greece only so it could flow out to rickety banks. Now, suddenly, the banks were absolved. There were very few bad loans left on the books of European lenders, everyone was clean, no bad actors at all. Except one. There were the institutions, the “troika”, clearly the good guys, so “helpful” with their generous offer of funds. And then there was Greece. What had been a mudwrestling match, everybody dirty, was transformed into mass of powdered wigs accusing a single filthy penitent (or, when the people with their savings in just-rescued banks decide to be generous, a petulant misbehaving child).

I won't claim to understand all the economic arguments involved, but I do think it speaks well to the degree to which the EU's handling of the Greek crisis is symptomatic of an overall disintegration over the last few years in any sense of solidarity between European countries.  Not so much a Union increasingly as a real-life franchise of Big Brother, wherein the various roommates squabble more and more over time as their proximity in a shared household (to the upkeep of which the various roommates' contributions vary wildly) breeds enmity.

The complete disunity over how to handle the refugees from North Africa is another example, what with Britain refusing to participate in any apportionment of the refugee-populations, and Denmark reintroducing border-controls.

When the game was up, when the global house of credit cards collapsed in the late Aughts, European leaders had a choice. They had knowingly and purposefully brought weak states into the Eurozone, because they genuinely, even nobly, wished to build a large, strong, United Europe. When they did so, they understood there would be crises. A unified Europe, they had always claimed, would be forged one crisis at a time. The right thing to have done for Europe at this point would have been to point out the regulatory errors and misaligned incentives that encouraged profligate lending and enabled corruption and waste among borrowers, and fix those. Banks that had made bad loans would acknowledge losses. The banks themselves would have to be restructured or bailed out.
But “bank restructuring” is a euphemism for imposing losses on wealthy creditors. And explicit bank bailouts are humiliations of elites, moments when the mask comes off and the usually tacit means by which states preserve and enhance the comfort of the comfortable must give way to very visible, very unpopular, direct cash flows.
The choice Europe’s leaders faced was to preserve the union or preserve the wealth, prestige, and status of the community of people who were their acquaintances and friends and selves but who are entirely unrepresentative of the European public. They chose themselves. The formal institutions of the EU endure, but European community is now failing fast.
It is difficult to overstate how deeply Europe’s leaders betrayed the ideals of European integration in their handing of the Greek crisis. The first and most fundamental goal of European integration was to blur the lines of national feeling and interest through commerce and interdependence, in order to prevent the fractures along ethnonational lines that made a charnel house of the continent, twice. That is the first thing, the main rule, that anyone who claims to represent the European project must abide: We solve problems as Europeans together, not as nations in conflict.
...
The fact of the matter is no country, not Germany, not France, would voluntarily put up with the sort of “adjustment” that has been forced on Greece, for the good reason that gratuitous great depressions are not actually helpful to an economy. Creditors have had five years to mismanage Greece and they’ve done a startlingly effective job. Syriza has had five months to object. However much you may dislike their negotiating style, however little you think of their competence, Greece’s catastrophe was not Syriza’s work. If creditors respond to Syriza’s “intransigence” with maneuvers that cause yet more devastation, that will be on the creditors. Blaming victims for having insufficiently perfect leaders is standard fare for apologists of predation. Unfortunately, understanding this may be of little comfort to the disemboweled prey.
Europe’s creditors are behaving exactly as one might naively predict private creditors would behave, seeking to get as much blood from the stone as quickly as possible, indifferent to the cost in longer-term growth. And that, in fact, is a puzzle! Greece’s creditors are not nervous lenders panicked over their own financial situation, but public sector institutions representing primarily governments that are in no financial distress at all. They really shouldn’t be behaving like this.
I think the explanation is quite simple, though. Having recast a crisis caused by a combustible mix of regulatory failure and elite venality into a morality play about profligate Greeks who must be punished, Eurocrats are now engaged in what might be described as “loan-shark theater”. They are putting on a show for the electorates they inflamed in order to preserve their own prestige. The show must go on.

Austerity may or may not be a viable option* for a country like the UK, but Greece is not the UK.  Greece's GDP is in freefall, and its ability to repay debtors will only worsen even more the longer this is dragged out, no matter what reforms are put in place.  It needs to be able to default, with all the consequences that brings, and/or inflate its currency.  If we had any sense we'd have let it do so long ago.  But Deutschland et al want to maintain the image of Europe, the illusion.  And letting Greece default or exit the Euro makes for bad optics.

Of course, were this truly a Union, then the debts of one would be the debts of all...


* Last time I checked, most patients who received a treatment of leeching didn't actually die.

01 July, 2015

Today(ish) in Republicans Saying Horrible Things

Tom DeLay on the recent decision on same-sex-marriage by the Supreme Court:
Well, we've already found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department. They're now going to go after twelve new perversions: things like bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that legal. And not only that, but they have a whole list of strategies to go after the churches, the pastors, and any businesses that tries to assert their religious liberty. This is comin' and it's coming like a tidal wave....They're coming down with twelve new perversions, and LGBT just isn't, is only the beginning. They're going to start expanding it to the other perversions.
Very precise, and very magical number that: twelve.


Rick Perry on the Supreme Court striking down Texas' absurd law requiring abortion-clinics to maintain hospital-level facilities:
"The Supreme Court's stay unnecessarily puts lives in danger by allowing unsafe facilities to continue to perform abortions," said the Republican presidential candidate in a statement. "I am confident the court will ultimately uphold these commonsense measures to protect the health and safety of Texas women."
Women's health, yeah that's what he's concerned about in shutting down clinics that often provide other services for women's health, beside abortion.


 Bill O'Reilly on the Affordable Care Act and the Supreme Court:
Now on healthcare, the issue is again greater good. Obamacare is obviously yet another federal entitlement program designed to help poor Americans at the expense of non-poor Americans. The president sold the law on the basis that it's a benefit for all; but only his party bought that....Subsequently, health insurance costs have risen for many working Americans, and a significant number of Doctors are refusing to take government-mandated insurance programs. But the four liberal judges don't really care about the overall impact of Obamacare. They want free healthcare for the poor.  That's what they want. And they'll find a legal justification for it, no matter what!  the actual law says. Add in Roberts and Kennedy, and presto! another enormous social safety-net that benefits the have-nots survives a valid legal challenge.
Note that there is no overlap between 'working Americans' and 'poor Americans' for Billo.


Rand Paul, who just met with racist anti-government radical Cliven Bundy:

You can be a minority because of the color of your skin or the shade of your ideology.


Erick Erickson on same-sex marriage and homosexuality:
First of all, you're only talkin' three to five percent of the population. Now, I know a lot of people, the thought is that you're born gay. That's, actually not really true in most cases. In some cases, I think it probably is. But in a lot of cases, if you got back to it, there are parental issues, there's abuse, and and that has a lot to do with it. And as you see a collapse of family -- I don't think that it's a coincidence that a collapse of family is, is directly inverse proportional or inverse related to the rise in people who identify as being gay.
Are we really living in the year 2015 ?  Sure it's not still 1985 ?


Bryan Fischer, on how the Supremes' ruling on same-sex marriage, is enciting terrorism:
I've not heard any body talking about this angle of what the Supreme Court did on Friday in their ruling imposing sodomy-based marriage on the United States of America. Now the whole world, this includes the Supreme Court, they know how the religion of peace deals with homosexuals -- they tie them to chairs and they throw them off of eight-storey buildings, and if they survive the fall, they stone them to death....Now how does the Muslim world justify their attacks on the United States ? Because they believe that we are the chief exporter of wickedness and decadence in the world. That's why they call us 'The Great Satan'. When we insult their god, their religion, their prophet, or their values, they claim a divine sanction to punish us for our transgressions. Now, the Left, interesting enough, actually agrees with the Muslim world on this score. Remember what happened with Pamela Geller and her 'Draw Mohammed Contest' in Garland, Texas. When the, when two Muslims shot the place up, who did the Left blame? They blamed Pamela Geller. She had provoked, she had incited, she had insulted the blessed prophet Mohammed and thus had brought this violence on herself. According to the Left, she got what she deserved. But now, what the Supreme Court did on Friday was to insult and offend the entire Muslim world, by celebrating and gloating and gushing over a sin that Muslims regard as so offensive to Allah that its practitioners must be thrown to their deaths. So the Supreme Court just gave the Muslim world another reason to attack us, and a terrorist attack appears imminent. So, if Muslims attack us, and they refer in any way to our celebration of homosexuality as part of the reason, then according to Liberals, culpability must be laid for that attack at the feet of the United States Supreme Court.
He'll be jumping for joy the second a bomb goes off, and the ambulance-sirens start to be heard in the distance.  'See, I told ya! It's the fault of all those perverted corrupt homosexual Liberals destroyin' America!'

27 June, 2015

New Statesman: The retreat of social democracy

Leader: The retreat of social democracy
Throughout Europe, the populist right is becoming more acceptable to many. Meanwhile, social democrats are failing to adapt to globalisation.
...in Europe and throughout the west, social democracy is in crisis or retreat. The centre left is locked out of power in parliamentary systems in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and, of course, the United Kingdom. On the Continent, the experience is the same for the centre left in Germany, the Netherlands, Portu­gal, Spain, Hungary and now also Denmark, following the defeat of the centre-left bloc, which had been led by Helle Thorning-Schmidt.
The British left once looked to Scandinavia for inspiration and guidance. “If you want the American dream – go to Finland,” Ed Miliband observed. Yet Finland turfed out its centre-left coalition two months ago; three of the four Nordic countries now face being run by governments of the right. Only in Sweden is the centre left in power.
When Mr Miliband was elected as Labour leader in 2010, he was convinced that the world would turn left after the financial crisis. He gambled his entire leadership on this belief (and it was no more than that) – and he lost. Voters were certainly disturbed by widening inequality but just as important were desires for fiscal rectitude, balanced budgets and tighter controls on immigration.
The mainstream centre left has also produced an anaemic response to the rise of identity politics. It is true that parties of the radical left – such as Syriza in Greece and Podemos in Spain – have capitalised on a general mood of disenchantment but, significantly, both are Eurosceptic. More frequently, nationalism has been channelled by the mainstream centre right as well as populist insurgencies. Indeed, it was the rise of the right-wing Danish People’s Party – a Scandinavian version of the UK Independence Party – that contributed significantly to the defeat of the centre-left bloc in Denmark.
Throughout Europe, the populist right is becoming more acceptable to many. Meanwhile, social democrats are suffer­ing from what the political scientist Peter Mair termed “indifference on the part of both the citizenry and the ­political class: they are withdrawing and disengaging from one another”. To many voters, the feeling of solidarity between fellow citizens so crucial to social democracy has become increasingly meaningless in an age of globalised mass migration: parties of the centre left have failed to adapt to globalisation and the collapse in trade union membership. Most fundamentally, they have not convincingly answered the existential question of what the left is for when parties of both left and right are committed to cutting public spending.

Yah.  Which speaks to both the more left-leaning parties' failings on questions of immigration, and the perennial threat of nationalistic appeals against the vaguely defined 'other' undermining more progressive appeals to unite the have-nots against the haves.  Increasingly, Europe, if not the Western world generally, seems poised to re-live the 1930's.  And if you're not scared, you're probably not paying attention.

24 June, 2015

The Culture Wars Continue

So, the Confederate 'Battle-Flag' (I always assumed it was the regular Confederate flag, which shows how much I know) may be coming down from the grounds of the Capitol in South Carolina, may finally be removed from the flag of Mississippi, and is no longer being sold by various retailers such as Walmart & Amazon.  But this...surely this is a step too far.

What have them Duke boys gotten themselves into this time?
One of the most iconic pop-cultural images of the Confederate flag — atop the famous "General Lee" car in The Dukes of Hazzard TV show — is about to fade away. Given current controversies swirling around the sale of merchandise bearing Confederate imagery, Warner Bros. Consumer Marketing has decided to stop the licensing of General Lee toys and models with the flag. 
Noooooooooooooooo !

Photo: Christopher Koppes on Flickr.  CC 2.0

Not the General Lee !  Now they're really messing with our cultural heritage...

21 June, 2015

See America Has to be Exceptional No Matter What, Whether That is in a Good Way or a Bad

By CHRISTOPHER BODEEN, Associated Press
BEIJING (AP) — Often the target of U.S. human rights accusations, China wasted little time returning such charges following the shooting at a historic black church in South Carolina that left nine people dead. Elsewhere around the world, the attack renewed perceptions that Americans have too many guns and have yet to overcome racial tensions.
Some said the attack reinforced their reservations about personal security in the U.S. — particularly as a non-white foreigner — while others said they'd still feel safe if they were to visit.
Especially in Australia and northeast Asia, where firearms are strictly controlled and gun violence almost unheard of, many were baffled by the determination among many Americans to own guns despite repeated mass shootings, such as the 2012 tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, where a gunman killed 20 children and six adults.
"We don't understand America's need for guns," said Philip Alpers, director of the University of Sydney's GunPolicy.org project that compares gun laws across the world. "It is very puzzling for non-Americans."
A frontier nation like the U.S., Australia had a similar attitude toward firearms prior to a 1996 mass shooting that killed 35. Soon after, tight restrictions on gun ownership were imposed and no such incidents have been reported since.
A similar effect has been seen elsewhere.
"The USA is completely out of step with the rest of the world. We've tightened our gun laws and have seen a reduction," said Claire Taylor, the director of media and public relations at Gun Free South Africa.
Ahmad Syafi'i Maarif, a prominent Indonesian intellectual and former leader of Muhammadiyah, one of the country's largest Muslim organizations, said the church shooting shocked many.
"People all over the world believed that racism had gone from the U.S. when Barack Obama was elected to lead the superpower, twice," he said. "But the Charleston shooting has reminded us that in fact, the seeds of racism still remain and were embedded in the hearts of small communities there, and can explode at any time, like a terrorist act by an individual."
A 21-year-old white man, Dylann Storm Roof, now faces nine counts of murder for the South Carolina shooting. An acquaintance said Roof had complained that "blacks were taking over the world."
Many places around the world struggle with racism and prejudice against outsiders, but mass shootings in the U.S., where the Constitution's second amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms, often receive widespread global attention.
Probably, no-one's more disturbed by or frustrated by the American obsession with guns and flat-out denial of continuing racism (shout-out for Chief Justice John Roberts ! *) than...the slight minority sane population of Americans.  Unfortunately, the history & the culture of said nation seems to have encouraged or attracted the development of an above-normal percentage of out-and-out lunatics in the population.

And as for the thing about the US being out of step with the rest of the world, the thing you have to understand, is that this is a point of pride in the US, where obsession with national greatness and inherent national superiority has turned the international and indeed consensus generally into something inherently suspicious.

One case in point being, the US' pride in being just one of three nations still refusing adoption of the metric system.  The US had pledged to do so, and presumably originally intended in fact to someday so do, but at some point, as it dragged its feet on and on, rather than let itself feel any guilt or sense of failure over the continuing delays over adopting Metric, politicians instead seized on the outlier status of the US as a point of pride, and started to turn what was once accepted consensus over international standards into an absurd bogeyman-style conspiracy.

Hence, here we are in the year 2015, such that when a Democratic candidate for the presidency says this:
Let's be bold -- let's join the rest of the world and go metric," he said during his launch. He clarified during a question-and-answer session after that it would be a "symbolic integration" meant to show goodwill to the world.
He acknowledged that shifting to the metric system could cost the U.S., but that "the economic benefits that would come in would surpass those costs of putting up new signs and the like."
    The response of one of his Republican candidates for the same office is inevitably this:
    Republican Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has already incorporated it into an attack. In an email to POLITICO, his spokesman Michael Reed said Chafee is a “Typical Democrat — wants to make America more European. Governor Jindal would rather make the world more American.”

    Because the entire rest-of-the-world would benefit so much from replacing something as easily understandable and easily calculated as a base-ten system of measurement with something from the Middle Ages based around such things at the size of a particular monarch's foot or hand !

    The country is run, to the shame of its sane residents, by a bunch of childish extremists.  The sort of people who, in the wake of a historically black church being shot up by an evident white-supremacist extremist racist (the event itself in the wake of so many other acts of mass-shootings and so many other demonstrations of racial violence), argue that we must not make the event 'about race', and that those who want to bring discussions of gun-control into the debate are radical demagogues, and who insist that, really, the asshole was targeting Christians, not blacks.

    Who did so, despite his own words to a survivor of the attack, explicitly outlining his motivations, and his desire to start a race-war.  Some of whom, will no doubt continue to do so, even given the recent discovery of an online manifesto making his violent racist aims and motivations even more explicit.

    The United States' problem is perhaps its own success.  A nation rich and powerful for much of its short history, and so rich and powerful since the end of the Second World War that it has come to see itself as beyond criticism, as beyond the purview of mere mortals.  The US is/has long been suffering from a sort of God-complex.  Rather than embracing criticism, and learning from its mistakes, the tendency is to demonise the critics, and to celebrate even its own failings (such as say the dismal state of healthcare in America) as successes (it's a sign of how free we how we compared to you Euro-commies !).  Live free, die young and poor; But opportunity abounds; You could have been rich and successful...theoretically...

    Perhaps demographic changes will one day reduce the ageing lunatic fringe to enough of a minority that the non-maniacs can take over the asylum.  The numbers are promising.  Then again, the lunatics may just burn down the asylum before that could/in order that that never be allowed to...happen.

    Especially as the tool of choice in burning down this particular asylum would likely be not lighters, but cheap, readily-available, and hugely (especially, thanks to the NRA, since the inauguration of a certain black president) stockpiled bullets.


    * As always, Thanks Harriet Miers !

    19 June, 2015

    Compare and Contrast


    The thing I love about cartoons like this in the British press, is the incredible detail involved -- a whole story contained in a single image.  That, and the relative absence of labels. 

    Half the fun's just trying to figure who's who and what's what -- As with the purple speedo there on Farage; well I think it's Farage -- The commentators online seem to think it's Putin for some reason.

    Editorial cartoons in other countries aren't like this.  For an example, I sought out cagle.com, always a source of some of the worst cartooning in America.  And on the third page, I found a perfect example of what I was looking for:


    Not to pick on this guy, and he can draw when he wants to, judging by the other work on his site, but this just says everything about the state of editorial-cartoons in America: Everything has to be labelled, can't say anything controversial, when in doubt, go for the cliches.

    Something bad happened in South Carolina.  Hate struck the treestate like an act of G-d.  Yeah, that, or a racist nut-job white guy went out and intentionally shot up a historically black church, killing a bunch of innocent black people who were there to worship:


    But we don't want to be talking about race, just as we don't want to talk about the proliferation of guns in America.  Too controversial !  At best, maybe we could mention mental illness.  But easier still to just take a readily identifiable symbol for a state (and the state is the real victim of course, huh Nikki Haley ?), put a label on it anyway, then draw a lightning-bolt labelled 'hate'.

    Speaking of that symbol, I think there may be something missing...


    Oh yeah !  Huh, wonder why he left out the crescent-moon ?  Can't be that there wasn't room.  Can't be too difficult to draw.  Nah, it's just a mystery.

    Now I know the media-markets are different, I know the Guardian doesn't make a profit, and I know what a shitty time it is for cartoonists in general these days.  But, even when the cash was flowing more freely, even when the print-media was still flourishing, shit like this proliferated.

    Newspaper-editors and readers alike see editorial cartoons as disposable, because, by and large, they are.  And yet as demonstrated by the likes of Martin Rowson, they don't have to be.  They can be works of bloody art.

    18 June, 2015

    Just Madness Everywhere

    2015, and we still seemingly have racially motivated attacks on historically black churches in the Southern United States. Wonder what the cooling-off-period is between a shooting and the inevitable right-wing response that it all could have been prevented if only everyone were armed.  Elementary Schools, Universities...why not Churches ?  Arm the congregation and clergy alike.

    Elsewhere in the news, Hong Kong still seemingly hasn't come to terms with the consequences of returning to mainland-rule and the fact that the PRC never had any intention whatsoever of allowing actual democracy to prevail under its rule, even in its special administrative regions,...NATO is continuing its lunatic tit-for-tat escalation with Russia by acting out war-games off the coast of Kaliningrad,...and bankers Goldman Sachs are attempting to show how humane they are and how great their concern for their staffinterns desperate for any foothold on the jobs-ladder to pay off student-debt, by insisting that they only work a maximum seventeen-hour workday.

    And then there's this:
    The increasingly tense relationship between the United States and Russia might be about to face a new challenge: a Russian investigation into American moon landings.
    In an op-ed published by Russian newspaper Izvestia, Vladimir Markin, a spokesman for the government's official Investigative Committee, argued that such an investigation could reveal new insights into the historical space journeys.
    According to a translation by the Moscow Times, Markin would support an inquiry into the disappearance of original footage from the first moon landing in 1969 and the whereabouts of lunar rock, which was brought back to Earth during several missions.
    “We are not contending that they did not fly [to the moon], and simply made a film about it. But all of these scientific — or perhaps cultural — artifacts are part of the legacy of humanity, and their disappearance without a trace is our common loss. An investigation will reveal what happened,” Markin wrote, according to the Moscow Times translation.
    Er, what, why ?.
    So, why is Investigative Committee member Markin speculating about conspiracy theories surrounding US moon landings that happened decades ago? In his op-ed, the Russian official also emphasized that “US authorities had crossed a line by launching a large-scale corruption probe targeting nine Fifa officials,” according to the Moscow Times.
    We're descending to this level of pettiness in our new cold war already ?

    Well, why ever not ?  The US hadn't even started its war in Iraq (you know the one I mean, don't quibble) before it was going after its own erstwhile allies with that 'freedom fries' & 'old Europe' nonsense.  This is how we do geopolitics in the twenty-first century apparently.  The grownups left the game long ago.

    01 June, 2015

    On Police Shootings

    US police kill more than two people a day, report suggests
    Data collected by the Washington Post newspaper suggests that the number of people shot by US police is twice as high as official figures claim.
    The paper said that during the first five months of this year, 385 people - more than two a day - were killed.
    The number of black people was disproportionately high among the victims, especially unarmed ones.
    Well, that's not really surprising.  Probably even more than that.


    A national debate is raging about police use of deadly force, especially against minorities. To understand why and how often these shootings occur, The Washington Post is compiling a database of every fatal shooting by police in 2015, as well as of every officer killed by gunfire in the line of duty.

    Do we have to pretend there's some mysterious secret here ?  The cops are trained to behave in a certain way, are encouraged to see every civilian on the street as a potential threat, especially since the era of the 'War on Drugs' and then the 'War on Terror.'  They are heavily armed, and have access to military-grade firearms.  They often wear body-armour.  Their departments obtain armoured vehicles scarcely distinguishable from tanks, along with all kinds of ex-military equipment via generous federal programmes.  The cops themselves are sometimes scarcely distinguishable from soldiers, even wearing camouflage uniforms.  And they are trained to value their own safety over that of those they supposedly serve.  And they are human.

    Fear is the strongest emotion in the human brain.  And humans are hard-wired to distinguish between in-groups and out-groups, to see out-groups as a potential threat.  Our fears are of course often deeply irrational, and rooted in internal prejudices, often including, partly as a result of our inherent wiring, racism.  But generally, we are given to fear The Other.  (A fear frequently manipulated by the political classes, but that's another subject).  The Other may have a different skin-colour, may be of a different class, may wear different clothing, may suffer from a mental illness, may speak with a different accent, may have a slightly different form of worship.  In a way, it doesn't matter.  They are Other, and we fear them, even when we know our fears are irrational.

    Just about everyone knows this experience, and probably from both sides.  That homeless guy mumbling to himself looks a little suspect.  Better step over to the other side of the street.  Every person of colour in America has been on the receiving end, probably for most of their lives.  Everyone who in any way looks or sounds a little different from their peers has experienced it.  Teenagers experience it from their elders.  Every man at some point has probably experienced it, from women understandably wary of physical assault or rape at the hands of men, not knowing who that guy on the subway or walking in the park is, what kind of person he might be.  Ninety-nine percent of the time, the imagined threat is non-existent.  But it could be so very real.

    Of course, the majority of cops aren't women.  And the majority aren't from minority racial groups.  They're mostly white men, often policing communities in which they don't themselves live.  On foreign turf.  On what, with their increasingly military-style training they eventually come to see as a battlefield.  And the primary tool with which they are equipped as they do their rounds is a gun.  Not on a rack back at the precinct.  Not a gun securely stowed away in the patrol-car.  A gun strapped to their hip.  Ready at hand for all eventualities.

    And then they come into contact with The Other.  Maybe they were called to the scene.  Maybe they were on patrol.  But there he or she is.  The possibly dangerous drug-addict or homeless person.  The woman with the scary tattoos.  The possibly Middle-Eastern-looking (quick, they do wear turbans over there right ?) guy speaking in a foreign language.  The sixteen-year-old black kid who somehow becomes magnified in the cop's imagination into a hulking monster.  Senses on high-alert, pulse racing, hand on hip...  Wait, is he reaching for ?...<BAM>  He was just reaching for his driver's licence ?  Too late.  He's dead.  Shit.  Better get the story straight.  Call it in.  'Shots fired.'  What will you tell the interviewing panel ?

    Police are authorized to use deadly force only when they fear for their lives or the lives of others. So far, just three of the 385 fatal shootings have resulted in an officer being charged with a crime — less than 1 percent.

    Well, it doesn't really matter.  You're not going to be charged.  Your fellow officers may even help cover up evidence if it keeps you out of trouble.  And why not ?  You were just doing your job.  Following training.  What if he had a knife ?  He could have been on me in an instant.  Twenty-one foot rule, remember.  Got to get home safe at the end of the day.  And you were afraid.

    30 May, 2015

    Stay Classy, JPost


    What ?  We're just sayin'.  And if you click on the link, the Title specifies 'Not Just News.'   I'm willing to bet that a large part of JPost's readership wouldn't even see or acknowledge what is so very fucking wrong with that shit in the middle of the image above.  I try to keep an open mind.  I really do.  And then I see shit like this.  And I just give up...

    Felix Kiprono is in love, and the young Kenyan lawyer is aiming high.
    According to the daily newspaper Nairobian, the object of Kiprono’s affections is none other than President Barack Obama’s daughter, Malia.
    Just how far is Kiprono willing to go to snatch the girl of his dreams? According to the Nairobian, he is prepared to offer the leader of the free world a dowry of 50 cows, 70 sheep, and 30 goats.
    "People might say I am after the family's money, which is not the case. My love is real," Kiprono told the Nairobian newspaper.
    Just how smitten is Kiprono with Malia Obama?
    "I got interested in her in 2008," he said. "As a matter of fact, I haven't dated anyone since and promise to be faithful to her. I have shared this with my family and they are willing to help me raise the bride price."
    He said he plans to deliver a letter to the US Embassy in Kenya to officially declare his intention.."
    Ours will be a simple life. I will teach Malia how to milk a cow, cook ugali (a starchy dish) and prepare mursik (a sour milk) like any other Kalenjin woman," he said



    Update: Apparently CNN & The Indy. also 'reported' on this non-story.  Which I guess, makes it okay...er, No.  No, it doesn't.  Our modern news-media is such a fucking disgrace.

    27 April, 2015

    Hang the DJ, Hang the DJ, Hang the DJ


    Be Afraid !



    Very Afraid !



    They're coming to take your jobswelfare ! (Cough)Bullshit(Cough)



    Bomb.  Bomb.  Bomb !  Your City !  BOMB !



    'Vengeance !' Your 'worst nightmare' !  Behold, the terrifying wee Scots warrior-queen practising her deadly martial arts in preparation to wiping out the Sassenach scourge !




    Well, it was always really only a matter of time, wasn't it ?