...and I don't know where CiF is currently, but the more mystery the better figuring this shit out. Love Rowson.
Showing posts with label Martin Rowson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Rowson. Show all posts
20 November, 2015
17 October, 2015
02 October, 2015
25 September, 2015
15 August, 2015
Religious Certitudes
Rowson is frankly a fuckin' god in terms of his visual skills...but he can't be everywhere at once. And with Bell struggling with that obsession with a certain condom, there may be room for a new number two...somewhere
Labels:
Andy Burnham,
Cartoons,
Dave Brown,
Idiocy,
Jeremy Corbyn,
Labour Party,
Liz Kendall,
Martin Rowson,
nofarhorizons,
Politics,
Silliness,
Steve Bell,
Stupidity,
The Independent,
Tony Blair,
Yvette Cooper
10 July, 2015
Martin Rowson: Homes of the Future!!
Ostensible context here.* But a great opportunity for dystopian brilliance from Rowson regardless.
* Actually, I'm not sure Osborne's entirely wrong on that issue.
19 June, 2015
Compare and Contrast
The thing I love about cartoons like this in the British press, is the incredible detail involved -- a whole story contained in a single image. That, and the relative absence of labels.
Half the fun's just trying to figure who's who and what's what -- As with the purple speedo there on Farage; well I think it's Farage -- The commentators online seem to think it's Putin for some reason.
Editorial cartoons in other countries aren't like this. For an example, I sought out cagle.com, always a source of some of the worst cartooning in America. And on the third page, I found a perfect example of what I was looking for:
Not to pick on this guy, and he can draw when he wants to, judging by the other work on his site, but this just says everything about the state of editorial-cartoons in America: Everything has to be labelled, can't say anything controversial, when in doubt, go for the cliches.
Something bad happened in South Carolina. Hate struck the treestate like an act of G-d. Yeah, that, or a racist nut-job white guy went out and intentionally shot up a historically black church, killing a bunch of innocent black people who were there to worship:
But we don't want to be talking about race, just as we don't want to talk about the proliferation of guns in America. Too controversial ! At best, maybe we could mention mental illness. But easier still to just take a readily identifiable symbol for a state (and the state is the real victim of course, huh Nikki Haley ?), put a label on it anyway, then draw a lightning-bolt labelled 'hate'.
Speaking of that symbol, I think there may be something missing...
Oh yeah ! Huh, wonder why he left out the crescent-moon ? Can't be that there wasn't room. Can't be too difficult to draw. Nah, it's just a mystery.
Now I know the media-markets are different, I know the Guardian doesn't make a profit, and I know what a shitty time it is for cartoonists in general these days. But, even when the cash was flowing more freely, even when the print-media was still flourishing, shit like this proliferated.
Newspaper-editors and readers alike see editorial cartoons as disposable, because, by and large, they are. And yet as demonstrated by the likes of Martin Rowson, they don't have to be. They can be works of bloody art.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









